As March Madness continues to draw closer, fans around the country eagerly await the latest projections from the "Bracketologists." Guys like
Jerry Palm and
Joe Lunardi give rabid basketball fans a look into the possibilities of where their team is or isn't headed coming tourney time.
But they aren't the only bracketologists just as the NCAA Tourney isn't the only bracket. There is, of course, the NIT (aka March Sadness).
NITology.com's Mike Scullin keeps fans in the loop regarding "the other side of the bubble."
2007 marks Scullin's third year as a bracketologist. Last year, he nailed 38 of 40 NIT teams (95%). The Georgia Sports Blog talked with him about his latest projections that have the Bulldogs as a 3 Seed in the NIT.
- - - - - - - - -Paul Westerdawg (PWD): Are you expecting any surprises this year with the NIT?
Mike Scullin (MS): We've already had surprises. There are currently five teams that have likely qualified for the NIT with automatic bids (Wright St., South Alabama, East Tennessee State, Marist and Austin Peay). You're going to see the best list of teams in history to be left out of the NIT this year. Big schools like UConn, Nebraska, Cal, South Carolina and Oklahoma are all at risk of being pushed out of the tournament.
(Update: Wright St. is no longer an NIT at-large team. Mike has taken them off his bracket)(PWD NOTE: Here's the ruling on
Automatic Bids for the NIT:
"The regular-season champion of any NCAA Division I conference (as determined by the conference's tie-break protocol) not otherwise selected to the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship will secure an automatic qualification to the National Invitation Tournament."
PWD: Why did they go from 40 teams last year to 32 this year?
MS: I think they wanted to create a more clearly defined tournament. Last year's play-in round where certain teams got a bye created confusion for fans. Personally, I would've gone from 40 to 64 teams instead of 40 to 32. There's going to be a big squeeze for NIT slots this year, and I wouldn't be suprised to see them change it back to a larger pool next year.
PWD: In the past, they didn't really have a seeded bracket in the NIT. Aren't the seedings new?
MS: Yes. Last year, was the first time that they had a selection committee who seeded the teams. In the past, it was a bracket designed to collect money rather than support a system of fairness. Now, it's much more fair. They have a selection committee now just like the NCAA tourney.
PWD: I noticed a regional component to the seeding process. What do you make of that?
MS: Once the seeds are determined, they look for geographically favorable match-ups within the seeds. They seed the 1s first, then they pair them up with the best geographic 8 seeds. Then they seed the 2s and 7 seeds. And so on.
(We could end up with Michigan in Round 2. Image: MZone)PWD: Who do you have Georgia playing in Round 1?
MS: Georgia vs. Missouri in Athens would be my guess.
PWD: If Georgia beats Auburn and loses to UF, do you think we can move up from a 3 seed?
MS: They might move up to a #2 or #1 seed. Georgia is right there with Kansas State and Bradley.
PWD: What kind of traffic does the site pull?
MS: Alot of traffic comes from message boards. Mostly, it's fans from message boards belonging to teams that I project into the NIT. I've been getting a lot of email lately from Auburn fans. They're in with the last spot right now so I hope they'll be happy.
PWD: Do you get hate mail?
MS: The hate mail is pretty straight forward. Usually it's just "You're an idiot." Obviously, people reading my site would rather be in the NCAA brackets.
PWD: How do you think your projections will do this year?
MS: It's not as cut and dried at the bottom of the field this year. There are six or seven NIT bubble teams. I doubt that I'll get 95% right again this year.
PWD: Thanks for your time. Hopefully, Georgia will win its first two SEC Tourney games so I can start thinking about the NCAA bracket sites again. I mean that in a nice way.
See Also:PWD
