I believe the SEC will add another team in enough time to get a full 14 teams scheduled for 2012. We've given our thoughts on who that team might be, but, hell, I'm way more wrong than I am am right. Given that, we've got to consider the possibility the SEC will have 13 teams for at least one season.
So, if the SEC doesn't expand before 2012, what will the schedule look like? The simple solution is copy the MAC. I won't rehash the scenarios competently laid out in Mr. SEC's or Team Speed Kills' articles linked above, but the gist is the East side of the schedule will be exactly the same, except for the two East v West games that will have to be lost somewhere to get the West side enough slots for games. Four West teams will play five division games, three will play six. The kicker is only division games count for winning the division, at least if you go strictly by the MAC plan.
Where does that leave us? It is simple, to me. Make Texas A&M quasi-independent in football for one year. They play an eight game conference schedule, without regard to division. Put the eleven schools that aren't already playing them (Arkansas has them scheduled) in a hat, and draw. They won't be eligible for the SEC championship game. Their results don't count in conference standings. As a carrot, they are eligible for the SEC's BCS slot if they are ranked higher in the final BCS standings than the conference champion. In a strange way, they could enhance their BCS national championship or at large chances by avoiding the SECCG.
Imagine playing Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, LSU, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi State, and South Carolina, with games in Tuscaloosa, Auburn, Athens and Gainesville. You go undefeated against that schedule, it'll be
TD
4 comments:
Ideal scenario (be it in 2012 or 2013):
Add A&M to the West and another school yet to be determined to the East. Make those 2 schools play each other every year as cross division rivals. Go to a 9 game conference schedule.
In that scenario, the conference continues on pretty much as it has for the last 20 years. One year of craziness in 2012 doesn't bother me. However, screwing with an already winning formula beyond that is foolish.
I'm with you. I hope (and believe) Slive gets the value of the brand is due, at least, in part due to the nature of the match ups. Adding another team and moving to a 9 game conf schedule is coming.
Obviously, I believe it'll happen before we finalize schedules for 2012.
This is simple. I'm not sure why everyone is making it so difficult.
SEC West -
Everyone plays all 6 division teams and 3 west teams.
SEC East -
Everyone plays all 5 division teams.
3 teams play 4 west teams.
3 teams play 3 west teams.
It's not like the interdivision schedule is fair anyway. Most years it would be much better to have Ole Miss, MSU, Arky, and A & M than to have LSU, Auburn, and Bama.
If you are an east team that plays an extra game, you win a tiebreaker with a team that has the same number of losses as you.
Can someone explain to me why this is so difficult?
I don't disagree, but with the level of paranoia in the conference, I don't think you'll sell it to any team that gets a 9th conference game foisted upon them, especially if it is a road game.
Post a Comment