While I'll agree that we have to have better marketing (he quotes Bruce Pearl, y'all!), he only dances around a bigger issue: top to bottom, the conference is terrible at basketball. Now, I'm not one to think you have to win all your games to expect a full crowd. Actually, I believe there is some chicken and egg here, as far as winning at home goes. I've been in Stegeman where it is a ghost town and with it full (both times). Georgia plays better when the Steg is rocking.
But I'm talking about the quality of basketball being played across the conference. After Florida and Kentucky, there is nobody that is looking like a sure fire NCAA team.
Wonder what the record for most teams a major conference has placed in the NIT?
And that is part of the problem. The SEC is all in on football now. Ten years ago we were a sports conference. At best there are four schools that really care about hoops: Florida, Kentucky, Arkansas, and Missouri. Tennessee only cared when Bruce Pearl was there telling everyone how awesome he was (and putting a brand of hoops on display that made it hard to argue with him). The ADs (and conference leaders) are laser focused on football TV revenue and failing to see the upside having strong men's basketball programs can do for you from a financial, football recruiting, and visibility/marketing standpoint.
The SEC is mediocre, at best. We have two very good teams, two more decent teams, three ok teams (UGA included), and seven terrible teams. While looking at attendance alone is not very illustrative, you can see some trends:
- Mizzou is tiring of the Frank Haith regime
- Same could be said for Anthony Grant at Alabama
- Marshall Henderson has been great for Ole Miss' attendance
- LSU fans believe in Johnny Jones
- Georgia's fans are starting to get excited about the improved record
|Team||2013-14 Average||+/- Last Year At This Time|
|Kentucky||22,662||< 1% decrease|